Should Employers be Held to Higher Standards in their Treatment of Employees

From 3arf

It may be unfair, but most employers can't be held to higher standards ... higher compared to what? ... in their treatment of employees. Of course, there are certain local, state and federal laws which protect employees from harassment, unpaid work and other abuses. However, an independent employer can do just about whatever he/she pleases in hiring, promoting, paying and firing employees.

There are jobs where the employee is more protected by regulations, such as those working for government agencies, large corporations and the military. But, even in those jobs, most workers are at the mercy of those who rank above them. Hence the business expression, "I report to...", which means I am at the mercy of.

In my long business and short Navy career, I experienced the entire gamut of behavioral standards. I reported to competent, fair bosses, as well as to lazy, stupid and prejudiced ones. For the last 20 years of my working life, I had managed to work my way up the ladder to be the boss of a large-company division consisting of 40 employees. In my own mind and conscience, I always adhered to high personal and professional standards of fair treatment of those employees.

Through my years in management, I experienced many serious situations in dealing with employees, concerning everything from hiring to firing. Fortunately for me, there were very specific company rules of behavior. I conducted performance reviews at least once a year with each person, more often if there was a very positive or very negative aspect involved.

It was a pleasure, of course, when the interview ended with my awarding a promotion and/or pay raise. Conversely, it was always disturbing and often difficult to deal with an employee in trouble. In those cases, the interview ended in a serious warning or, at the worst, termination.

Employers, if intelligent and fair-minded, will be advisors and mentors for their employees. Additionally, such professional basics invariably result in workforces that are more motivated to higher quality performances. A boss who sets an example of higher standards puts him/herself in a win-win situation. Why should anyone want to behave otherwise?


Related Articles